Maybe it's a communication thing, but I'm not debating the letter of the definition of outsourcing, rather the spirit. They can dress it up and call it anything they want, but the hard fact of the matter is that jobs that would have been done here, will be done there. Call it Job-a-going-away or whatever you want, it's the same thing. And, by the way, if I have to deal with one more person from Dell who can't speak English, I'm going to cry. And I'm not the type of guy who looks like he would cry, but I will.

Do you do a fair amount of work for contracts outside Bulgaria?


>
>>How is this still not considered "outsourcing?" The jobs are still going to residents of India, as much as I can tell.
>
>Simple
>May be you have never read economic description of term "OUTSOURCING"
>In Vocabulary is described:
>Outsourcing - using any third party vendor to provide services
previously provided by regular employees; vendor may absorb the firm's
current staff and assets or may use its own staff and assets (or some
combination of both); work may be performed on site or at a remote location
(either domestic or overseas);
>
>If one company move some part of his business to be done by external company - this is outsourcing. The country which provide bigest share of outsourcing services is US, not India or China :-)
>
>If you open company in forin country - it is subsidiary or branch of mother company. peoples which are hired are employees of company and comapny stop to use outsourcing services.
>
>I suppose that I am clear.