>It was the most outrageous message I've ever seen on UT!

Outrageous yes, but at least it was accurate<s>.

>You probably spend too much time on DEVX forum barking to other people.

Actually not. The DevX forum in many ways is pretty offensive - mostly due to the foul language. Ed, I am not attacking you personally here. That is something that would have occurred on DevX. I believe in open and honest communication.

>I'm not going to discuss any things with you anymore until you will apologize.

Apologize for what?? The fact that you gave bad and incomplete advise and I am hold you accountable for it. If that type of stuff is going on - then I do not hold hope for the bar to be raised on UI. If I did the same thing - I would expect the same treatment. Instead of your response to me, you should have said something like - "your right John, I did not go into as much detail and presented the different alternatives". You know how I know this - because I had my ass handed to me on more than one occasion on CIS - until I learned.

>I spent much more time here than you, that's right.

So.....

>And I got some positive replies from people, so I believe I had chance to help >them here, and I don't care what you're thinking about this.

Thats fine, and I am sure you have helped many people. The answer you gave the guy was pretty lame and was rather incomplete. I could just picture the guy implementing that advice and racking his head over the resulting problems. That type of stuff I take very personally. That fact that you don't seem to care ticks me off even more.


>The last technical note: my interface technique really provides way of >eliminating the necessity of private datasessions completely.

See...this type of stuff is what really exposes you here. Recall in Fox 2.x - we did'nt have private data sessions either. Seems to me if you just set all of your forms to use the Default DataSession - no Private DataSessions would be created. You call this a technique? If you spent a lot of time dealing with this issue, well... that brings up a whole set of other questions.

>Many people here again know what's this about, just because they have respect >to listen others.

I guess that's it, I don't have respect for what you are saying... Thanks for clearing that up.

>I guess the main problem you have is to really approach MS and ask to install >SuperMVP status which will be eternally in your possession.

No. Rather, you living up to your MVP status will do just fine

Case closed.