Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Coders 'should be held liable for flaws'
Message
General information
Forum:
Social marketing
Category:
Security
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01058466
Message ID:
01058875
Views:
10
>>>Anyone have any comments on this?
>>>
>>>http://uk.builder.com/0,39026540,39275698,00.htm
>>
>>Victor,
>>
>>If you want the short answer...#$%&
>>
>>The long answer...?
>
>lol!

Thomas,

I'm reminded of Steve McConnell's metaphor for software design...construction. Every basic job you could find in building, say, a frame house, you can find building an application.

Both have architects.
Both have designers.
Both have carpenters (programmers/coders).
Both have people that make the materials and the tools (operating systems and compilers as opposed to wood and hammers).

Now let's say, that some construction company builds a wood frame house, and after 3 days of use, one of the floors in a room collapses.

What they say here is blame the carpenters (programmers), but in this situation, who was really at fault? Did floor collapse because the architect failed to properly calculate the stress? Or was that the designers (engineers) fault. What if the wood was rotten? Or nail gun didn't provide enough force to properly drive the nail?

What this reminds me of, Tom, is that female PFC who was stationed in Iraq at the prison, who was recently sentenced to 3(?) years in prison because of her actions there. The thing that bothers me is that no one further up the chain of command has been charged.

I may not have served in the military, but both my parents did and there was a neighbor (a captain) who was stationed at the 5th Army headquarters in the neighborhood. Now I may not know all there is to know, but I know this. PFCs, who are not in the field, do not do things like this unless explicitly ordered to. Yet...
George

Ubi caritas et amor, deus ibi est
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform