Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
If I can't get the cursor from a DLL, what other benefit
Message
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Client/serveur
Divers
Thread ID:
00106141
Message ID:
00106182
Vues:
31
Steve,

Can't you either 1) accept a filename as a parameter and do the select into table (pcFilename) or 2) return the cursor filename obtained from dbf() to the client?

>OK, so the DLL has it's own private little agenda. My needs are to build a DLL that (well, I thought anyway) could have utilized connection and SQL objects to properly return a cursor regardless of the backend. Now that I can't get a cursor from there, it appears that the only real use for the DLL would be as a SQL parser to simply create and then pass back a proper SQL string for the host to run. This doesn't exactly seem advantageous. So for the folks here at the UT who are using DLLs to get to various backend data, just what are you doing that makes the DLLs the thing to use. If I can't get the cursor for population of grids, that leaves me with just various object properties that I might map to a VB/C++ form. By not being able to return a cursor from a SELECT statement to VB/C++, it seems that I'm limited in what I can do.
df (was a 10 time MVP)

df FoxPro website
FoxPro Wiki site online, editable knowledgebase
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform