>>>Please don't tell me that minorities are been kept away from schools/Universities and jobs.
>
>>From the better ones only.
>
>I don't know about that. Have you ever seen who goes to Harvard and other Ivy league schools? The student body list is so full of foreign names.

Is a foreign name a "minority"? And I think the issue is about minorities at home, not foreigners. ... Does it follow that a foreign named person is a poor person? I just don't see the logic here.

>
>>IMO, there's no way out of having the poor, as long as we have a lessez-faire capitalism and unrestrained corporations. The powers that be will always need certain level of unemployment (6% unemployment is good for the economy, they say), or else they'd have to deal with employees' demands, and start paying them properly and give them benefits and even, maybe even, decrease their profit rate because of that.
>
>Interesting theory.

It's more than a theory. Or at the least it's an important part of making capitalism work "well". "Well" being defined as 'for the corporation's benefit'.

>
>
>>Charity and/or throwing money at the poor will not work in the long run because it doesn't address the cause. And the cause is the corporate need for a certain level of unemployment... which is something that's been out there for a few centuries now.
>
>I think people like NAACP, Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton needs them more.

That's what the media (big corporate, don't ever forget) wants you to believe. Making the poor, and those who try to do something about it, into "the enemy" lets corporations take more and more. Look at what they've done to the reputation of unions over the last 20 years or so!
Corporations now run under the objective of more $$$ and more $$$ and more $$$ and we have been thoroughly conditioned by the media and schooling that more $$$ is THE essence of life. Too bad for those who just can't hack it.