>>>>Yeah, that's smart marketing: Create a problem and ask money for the solution. NO, we should get it for free. Not Refox, but the tool that prevents usage of Refox to decompile.
>
>
>There are many opinions about Open source progamming. Here is mine. I have been at programming for many years, many of which I gave away the solutons, without anything in return. To me open source only profits the user of the software, and leaves tthe programmer(s) pennyless. I do not work for free anymore, and I do not use any open source software, that most likely is written by out-of-work programmers, and having a good reason for being out-of-work.
>Why should the alarm company give you a free alarm system, because by trying to protect you home they creeated a problem of burglars in your neighborhood?
Well then, here we fully agree! I too want the source of my applications to be encrypted and obscure for everybody else in the world, including my customers. And then I'm confronted with the product (Refox) that decrypts my app on the fly. This is illegal unless the company offewrs me the opportunity to protect my apps from Refox, for FREE, of course!
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
