><snip>
>
>I understand and Agree with you and Peter.
>
>With you Jos because ReFox is a tool that can be really useful and seem to do a good job out of recovering source code.
>
>I agree with Peter because I, like Peter (if I understood correctly), don't want to have to buy ReFox to protect my application against being decompiled by ReFox. To me there seems to be a gimmick in there <g>
>
>So I have a solution to propose. In the main program of my application if the string "ReFox is not welcome in here" is there then ReFox won't recover the source code for that application.
>
>If I ever lose my source code and that string was there then I'll have to live with the consequences <g>
>
>Does that make sense to you guys?
My first impression, a very neat solution. However, there is one drawback. The current and older versions of Refox already decompile my apps and do not pay attention to such a string.
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
