It was Victor Anderson who made that comment.
>>>Peter can Iask you a question? Which version of Refox are you refering to? As far as I'm told by the programmer that wrote Refox, is that Refox 8, might have been 'hackable', but according to him, the current version of Refox is not 'hackable' and as such would properly protect you application from being decompiled with Refox or other tools of this type. Here is a quote:
>>>I think that the modifying of ReFox.exe body (by hacking, cracking, patching or whatever ... )
>>>can be done on ReFox8 only - the old DOS version which was not protected.
>>>ReFox XI body is compressed and protected by ******** (edited) and there is no chance
>>>to modify the code.
>>
>>Mike, I'm referring to the latest version. It was someone else here (I think Jos Pols) who implied that Refox could be cracked easilly.
>
>You think incorrectly, I did not say this. In any case, I would imagine that cracking anything non-trivial is rarely easy. But almost always doable.
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only