>The profit margin should be approx. 30 percent of the price for you? It is an expensive tool, so the margin per sold copy is quite high. I guess, you are saying here that it is not sold often times and that totalled margins are therefore low. Tip: Perhaps a version can be created that decompiles only one time, for a lower price. Having given this advice, I of course still plea for a free utility that enables us to make an application insensitieve to decompilation with Refox.


Sorry, I cannot discuss profit margins with you here, but 30% is not right and too high.

>>>I of course still plea for a free utility that enables us to make an application insensitieve to decompilation with Refox.

I cannot help you there either. Free does not exist in my dictionary and I will not bring this request to Jan, so if you are up to it sending him a message, but I will not support a move in that direction.


>>>Why would creator or distributor of ReFox be willing to do something about it. It's a matter of $$$. You'll probably buy it out of frustration so in the end everybody will be happy. Them because of $$$ and you because or your new acquired protection (Even if you're terribly frustrated about it).
>>
>>I can only speak for myself, but I will not quit my day job distributing Refox. The profit margins are very minimal. And there aren't many people willing to buy Refox, but mostly they want to recover their code, which would mean using Refox once, which does not warrant the purchase of Refox.
>
>The profit margin should be approx. 30 percent of the price for you? It is an expensive tool, so the margin per sold copy is quite high. I guess, you are saying here that it is not sold often times and that totalled margins are therefore low. Tip: Perhaps a version can be created that decompiles only one time, for a lower price. Having given this advice, I of course still plea for a free utility that enables us to make an application insensitieve to decompilation with Refox.