>>>geeeze....
>>>
http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/11/02/cia.report.ap/index.html>>
>>That is indeed quite terrifying. As if the ill-treatment at Abu Graib and Guantamo wasn't bad enough already.
>
>Aren't we jumping to conclusions here? Is it really quite terrifying? (barring another "Abu")
Why should we exclude the possibility of another Abu Graib? With all that secrecy, it is likely to be much worse in this case.
>What's the alternative? Surely we're not supposed to just turn them loose. I say at least subject them to 8 hours of Pat Robertson, daily.
Hehe, you seem to be an expert in torture.
Difference in opinions hath cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire... (from Gulliver's Travels)
