>>>
>>>Aren't we jumping to conclusions here? Is it really quite terrifying? (barring another "Abu")
>>>
>>>What's the alternative? Surely we're not supposed to just turn them loose. I say at least subject them to 8 hours of Pat Robertson, daily.
>>
>>The alternative is not to turn them loose, it's to not keep the whole thing a secret. One of the great foundations of democracy is transparency. One has to assume that it's a secret for a reason. There must be something they don't want the public to know about. That's a no-no in a truly democratic society.
>
>What we don't know is not necessarily bad, and there are things that all governments do not want you to know.
Sorry, but the fact that governments do not want us to know things in a democracy where they supposedly work for us is, in itself, bad. The problem is that politicians generally tend to forget who they work for once they get into power.
Remember the part about 'Government of the people, by the people and for the people'? I certainly don't recall any part that says "Government of the cabal, by the cabal and for the cabal".
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only