Doesn't any change of this magnitude involve losses? Look at our own history in the revolutionary war. We had help along the way from others. Funny, it was about a dictator and religous freedom too.

>I think it very much matters. Because it gets to the root of the problem. There are several issues that many voiced before the invasion that were never addressed, or even worse pushed aside and the person who voiced the opinion minimized.
>
>At the core, it was stated by many experts that with the cultural makeup in Iraq, there was a far, far, far greater chance that whatever we did would create a major civil war, rather then establish a democracy.
>
>What's the death toll today? I definitly think we are closer to a civil war then a democracy.
>
>
>>Okaaaay... Why was that a bad thing? Seriously, not pushing buttons here. Does it really matter how it came about?
>>
>>>Invading Iraq has been a goal of the neocons since at least the first Bush administration. Have you been following history? How many have to come forward to state that there was a clear focus on Iraq immediately following 9-11.
>>>
>>>>>>If all that is true, why do you think they wanted to invade Iraq? If you say it was for oil, then you are even younger than I thought.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Did I say it was about oil? I don't believe I did.
>>>>
>>>>Didn't say you did. I asked you if all that is true, why do you think they wanted to invade Iraq?