>Ah but that's just my point. Yes there is a possibility but at this moment it hasn't been determined that it's a similar case.
>
>My number next is that this has to be done, as terror suspects they will be held and questioned some way or another, with the purpose of obtaining information to determine if in fact they are and more importantly (if they are) information that can be used to prevent attacks. This should be expected, and it's only the methods of getting to that information what we quibble about.
Yes, I agree.
Difference in opinions hath cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire... (from Gulliver's Travels)
