>>>>All I plea for is a free utility that can help us prevent decompilation with (a non-cracked) Refox itself. It would be the antidote to a problem that Jan has introduced and therefore is responsible for.
>
>Refox XI branding level II+ does that. It already exists and it is not free. And as for a free one anti-refox apprently does the same thing but its
free!. So the choice is yours.
>Your request for a "free utility to protect your application from being decompiled by Refox" has been granted a while ago.
What do you mean with 'granted a while ago'? Antirefox has, at this moment to us here, not yet been proven to work correctly.
You are denying that there is a responsibility issue. The maker(s) of Refox introduced a problem and the maker(s) of Refox should also give the solution to this problem, for free. It is logical thinking.
Each time you reply, you try to get away with it. Either you (deliberately?!) misinterpret my words or you simply ignore the issue and focus on something less relevant. It is a false tactic, in my perception. You'd be a far better representative if you said you would talk about the issue with Jan, understanding the point made.
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
