>>I am suggesting that Jan makes a special, free, utility that does in part what his current Refox already does: Make a vfp-exe insensitive to decompilation with Refox. Is it that hard to read my texts?

The part I do not agree with is the Free part.

>>>By the way, I appreciate it that you finally have discussed it with Jan.

Finally? No, I brought it up a the begining of this thread. I have my own convictions on the matter, but I cannot pretend to speak for him. Apprently this type of request has come up a couple of times over the last 13 years.

>At this moment, you and I may agree to disagree.

Agreed.



>>>What do you mean with 'granted a while ago'? Antirefox has, at this moment to us here, not yet been proven to work correctly.
>>
>>That would be AntiRefox's probelm to fix. But at least with AntiRefox you are a lot closer to resolving your request than with Jan.
>>
>>>You are denying that there is a responsibility issue. The maker(s) of Refox introduced a problem and the maker(s) of Refox should also give the solution to this problem, for free. It is logical thinking.
>>
>>No, he did not introduced a problem. In 1992 Jan saw a demand for a product like Refox and he created refox to answer this demand.
>>
>>
>>>Each time you reply, you try to get away with it. Either you (deliberately?!) misinterpret my words or you simply ignore the issue and focus on something less relevant. It is a false tactic, in my perception. You'd be a far better representative if you said you would talk about the issue with Jan, understanding the point made.
>>
>>I think your questionning the way I reply and not what I reply. I just don't agree with your request in this matter. You are suggesting that Jan writes an application that has been already written. (Refox XI does exactly what you want and I think you said you already own Refox XI so you already own the utility you are looking for).
>>I have brought your points to Jan, and his position is the same as mine. Although it is irrelevant if I did bring this topic to Jan, as you are discussing with me and not him. And I have suggested to you to send Jan an e-mail to voice your point of view.
>
>I assume that this reply makes the earlier reply (let's agree to disagree) invalid?!
>
>No, I do not own a copy of Refox.
>
>I am suggesting that Jan makes a special, free, utility that does in part what his current Refox already does: Make a vfp-exe insensitive to decompilation with Refox. Is it that hard to read my texts? I know it's not native English, but others have proven that they read what I mean.
>
>By the way, I appreciate it that you finally have discussed it with Jan. I guess that's almost all that you can do at this moment. It might be the case that I'll send him an email myself.
>
>At this moment, you and I may agree to disagree.