>>I remember that you wrote in one reply that you would
not contact Jan about this issue.
>
>I meant that I would not contact Jan to present your request, or plead your case to him. I contacted him to keep apprised of the subject of the thread.
In that case, did you this time seriously discuss the plea with him?
>>>>>I am suggesting that Jan makes a special, free, utility that does in part what his current Refox already does: Make a vfp-exe insensitive to decompilation with Refox. Is it that hard to read my texts?
>>>
>>>The part I do not agree with is the Free part.
>>>
>>>>>>By the way, I appreciate it that you finally have discussed it with Jan.
>>>
>>>Finally? No, I brought it up a the begining of this thread. I have my own convictions on the matter, but I cannot pretend to speak for him. Apprently this type of request has come up a couple of times over the last 13 years.
>>
>>I remember that you wrote in one reply that you would
not contact Jan about this issue.
>>
>>>>At this moment, you and I may agree to disagree.
>>>
>>>Agreed.
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
