>><snip>
>Then why have the anti-refoxing ability built into refox to begin with? Oh yeah, for the exotrsion factor! You SURELY are not this naive are you?

Apparently so.


>Yes, John Doe should of used better protection, but this is just an example - and anyway it's beside the point - which is that if you're paying for something to protect yourself from the same thing - its extorsion - and that's what MOST developers that I've talked to have the stupid thing to begin with.

Then they did'nt think it through very well did they? But lets leave it at agree to disagree :)