>Greg,
>
>In case I follow your suggestion, the same "front-end".DBC, containing remote views, would be used to access both the DBC and the MS SQL back-ends, just changing the connection? Or do I need a "front-end".DBC for each type of back-end?
>
>Thanks.

Either way would work. I guess it truly depends on your taste. The of having seperate DBC, is allow the application to upsized without having to modify anything that the client site(s).