That really is my point in a few other messages. It cannot be proven what Bush saw nor what congress saw and where the information came from yet. Not only that, it is entirely too easy to backdate a memo or create one to cover your behind after the fact that it will take more supporting documentation or people to come forward and testify before we will
really know for sure. I think in 20 years or so
maybe the full story will come out...
>>
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/11/11/bush.intel/index.html>
>Did the Democrats really see the same intelligence that the Bush administration saw? I seem to remember coming across some articles describing a deep division beween Cheney's office and the CIA. I believe you can make a case that Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, etc. cherry-picked the intelligence to make their case. The question to me is, did the Dems see all the intelligence, or just what was cherry-picked?
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
