>Thanks Barbara -
>
>I knew I could include any fields I wanted; I just didn't see a reason to include fields I wasn't going to display (e.g. that key data) until I had read your earlier message where it looked like your were relying on the existence of the key field in the parent to relate to a description in one of your child fields. Anyway, I tried it and eliminated some of my 'set relationship to...' and it worked.
>
>Sylvia

Great!!