I do not believe everything I read/hear. If I read something such as Vanity Fair that piques my interest I will research further. I've read several interesting articles in Vanity Fair that supplied information that was easily verfiable. Why do you have a problem with that?

In this particular case, the issues the article discusses about what makes fundamentalist evangelicals so wacky is easily verifiable. Typing "rapture" into google yields 5,000,000 hits.

It seems to me you are the one making extremely general comments without any factual backing. It is a common thread with all your posts.


>>If you are going to comment, please send something intelligent.
>
>>I've not ever been really impressed with anything you've had to say. But wasting time to see a comment like this is a total waste of my time. Care to refute any comments in the article? Otherwise please button up.
>
>
>Perry.
>Wise man once told me to never believe EVERYTHING you read\hear. With all due respect, it looks like you need to take the same advise. It seems you read article(s) that agrees with your point of view and take it as gospel. Therefore, I give no credence to much of what you say here either.
>
>I've read Vanity Fair before. Do you really think it would give religion, particularly Christianity, a fair shake?