>>Neither intelligent design nor creation have achieved the scientific theory level, so my money is on evolution. Yet another reason why neither should be taught in science classes. Relgion classes sure, but no science.

>That's fine, you can bet your way and I'll be mine. Scientific theory is another way of saying a good guess, except for all the holes in the theory.

Although I think anthropology is an interesting study I don't think it has nearly the answers to the origin of man that they claim.

I read an artile about three/four years ago that stated that many of the scientists that study evolution have never even seen or touch a real fossil. Not only becuase they're to fragile to be handled, but because there really isn't that much of them. So they rely on cast made from the original and even with that the casts arn't always an accurate representation of the original.
In many instances they use plaster to fill in the gaps and holes using "rough" estimates of how they think the whole specimen would have looked like.