I'm betting you only hear from the choir on this one, meaning those already in agreement with you. I think almost everyone at the time war was declared, in their hearts, were in agreement. Based on what we knew at the time. But, of course, they wouldn't admit that now. It would be funny if the statements she made about this kept Hilary from getting into the White House someday...

>Why no outrage over the fact that Hillary and the other leaders of the dummycrat party supported the war and are now running for the trees?
>
>http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/21/iraq.hillary/
>"Obviously, I've thought about that a lot in the months since," she said. "No, I don't regret giving the president authority because at the time it was in the context of weapons of mass destruction, grave threats to the United States, and clearly, Saddam Hussein had been a real problem for the international community for more than a decade."
>
>In other words, she believed the intelligence reports, just like W did.
>
>http://www.wsws.org/articles/2005/nov2005/sena-n16.shtml
>
>Senate Democrats went on record Tuesday to support the war in Iraq and the continued operation of the US concentration camp at Guantánamo Bay. A large majority of the 44 Senate Democrats lined up with the Republican majority and the Bush administration in key amendments to the defense appropriations bill. The Senate session culminated in a bipartisan 98-0 vote to approve the nearly $500 billion budget for the Pentagon.
>
>John Kerry (remember him - y'all thought he was grand)
>
>http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0301-01.htm
>
>Back in October 2002, when Senator Kerry voted to grant President Bush a blank check to make war, he tried to scare the American public into thinking that such an invasion was essential to the defense of the United States. Despite a lack of credible evidence, Kerry categorically declared that “Iraq has chemical and biological weapons” and even claimed that most elements of Iraq’s chemical and biological weapons programs were “larger and more advanced than they were before the Gulf War.” Furthermore, Kerry asserted that Iraq was “attempting to develop nuclear weapons,” backing up this accusation by claiming that “all U.S. intelligence experts agree” with such an assessment. He also alleged that “Iraq is developing unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) capable of delivering chemical and biological warfare agents, which could threaten Iraq’s neighbors as well as American forces in the Persian Gulf.”
>
>Where is the outrage?