>>>Which of my arguments describes the idea of democracy as a ruling entity?
>
>Tell me again whether you think that democracy is good and needs to propogate itself.

Sure.


>Then tell me whether in 2005 there are prevailing rulers who act according to your beliefs, and whose actions you support.

Sure.


>I assert that this pattern is expansionist and imperialist.

But who is the imperialist? America? You think Iraq is an American state? I don't.



>>>So, because Iraq is now part of the Democractic empire, you have dismissed my argument that the change in Iraq is unique and good.
>
>No idea how you reached such a conclusion.

Then what is your point? Why anthromorphizing democracy into a ruling unit? Do you think you have a point or are you being intentionally silly?