>>>Do you still believe that there were WMDs in Iraq at the time of invasion?
>>
>>No, I think they were moved during the six month lag time prior to the invasion.
>
>So Hans Blix's request for another 60 days to investigate wouldn't have made a difference, even though he said, after years of investigation, there was no evidence?

From the WMD report page 60
Although the ISG did find indications that Saddam remained
interested in reconstitution of the nuclear program after sanctions were lifted, it concluded that Iraq’s ability to reconstitute its program progressively decayed after 1991.

page 112
The ISG did conclude, however, that “Saddam never abandoned his intentions
to resume a CW effort when sanctions were lifted and conditions were judged
favorable,” and that Iraq’s post-1995 infrastructure improvements “would
have enhanced Iraq’s ability to produce CW” if it chose to do so.

Still say there was no evidence that Saddam was trying to get wmds?