>>First assassination, now the US is the Fourth Riech. You are just full of surprises, Jim!
>
>Lets be fair to Jim.
>When he spoke of assassination I think he was merely trying to point out that it was an option, not a solution.
>
>But I believe assassination of foreign leader is not a policy of the United States.... I think.

Does that mean that bombing the hell out of Saddam's home while hoping he's in it is not defined as 'assassination'? Interesting concept.

>
>>>And tell me how this differs from Hitler's desire to have had a 1000 years global Reich.