>I found vfp9 working with the table that stored in network file server (linux) is much much slower then VFP7.
>
>Does it normal? Anyway to solve it?

I guess you are talking about DBFs? This may because a bug was fixed, which in earlier version could give wrong results. Make sure that CPDBF() and CPCURRENT() are identical for all tables. If they are different, Rushmore will be disabled.