>Peter,
>I've been experimenting with Molebox a bit.
>I don't understand why, if I only want to protect a single VFP exe (which is were the intellectual property is), why do I have to enter the exe in the "Executable" textbox and also include it in the "Package contents" list too?
That way the whole vfp-executable will be included in the moleboxed executable. Else, only a starter exe of 62k will be created. It is the workaround for vfp applications. I think it is this way because a vfp-exe is not like a c++ exe. It is a starter and the rest is 'data', rather than assembler. Just do it. It will work. Believe me. :)
>I distribute about 20 files along with the EXE, all bundled in an Installshield installer. All I really care about is protecting the code in the EXE.
>
>Thanks for any suggestions.
>
>>>hi all
>>>Which is the best way KONXISE vs cryptor vs refox brand, for protact application sourse code,
>>>thanks
>>
>>I now use Molebox (Pro). Look at
http://www.molebox.com/
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
