>Well, I'm not all that sure that Saddam would have been very successful attacking Saudi Arabia, but be that as it may, assuming the U.S. attacked Iraq because they wanted the oil available to themselves, then I think you're pointing at the wrong schoolyard bully. A bully is a bully whether it's Saddam or Dubya.
>
>Don't get me wrong, I'm not sorry to see Saddam gone, but it would have been nice if it had been done according to international law, and if the U.S. were operating under international law since then, instead of snubbing their noses at it.
... and if they had done so for honest reasons, instead of merely looking after their own interests.
Difference in opinions hath cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire... (from Gulliver's Travels)
