What "facts" are you talking about?

Are you saying we had the go-ahead from the UN? Does 49/191 make it just?

Your unfounded arrogance is comical.<g>



>>I thought he was still on parole. The parole officer wanted more time and courts were willing to let the parole officer do his job. Then a couple vigilantes broke in and took him out.
>>
>
>Go back and reread the UN sanctions. http://www.state.gov/p/nea/rls/01fs/14906.htm
>
>I believe there are 17 sanctions and 49 coalition countries that revoked his parole.
>
>Nothing like having facts on your side. Of course, you wouldn't know about that, would you?<g>