And again, the CIA now says THERE WERE NO WMD'S. The evidence never existed.



>>Again, show the proof that Iraq moved the weapons.
>>
>>You're making this all up as you go along. But then again, so is Bush.
>>
>>
>Are you not reading, or maybe you just don't want to admit the POSSIBLITY the WMDs were moved. What part of "sufficiently credible evidence" do you not understand?
>
>http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20050427-121915-1667r.htm
>
>CIA can't rule out WMD move to Syria
>
>
>By Rowan Scarborough
>THE WASHINGTON TIMES
>
>The CIA's chief weapons inspector said he cannot rule out the possibility that Iraqi weapons of mass destruction were secretly shipped to Syria before the March 2003 invasion, citing "sufficiently credible" evidence that WMDs may have been moved there.
>Inspector Charles Duelfer, who heads the Iraq Survey Group (ISG), made the findings in an addendum to his final report filed last year. He said the search for WMD in Iraq -- the main reason President Bush went to war to oust Saddam Hussein -- has been exhausted without finding such weapons. Iraq had stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons in the early 1990s.