I do not visit many liberal websites but I would not be surprised if you think UT has a liberal bias. As far as drivel, I have to object. You bring up "facts" to bolster your argument and they serve only to weaken it. You hold onto the absurd claim it is "probable" that WMDs were moved without any evidence of such.

At least this last point makes some sense. I think it short sighted and will lead to problems in the future, but in the short term you are correct we act in whatever manner we choose.



>>
>The drivel you have been espousing, which can be gleaned from most any liberal website.
>
>>If you do not respect the UN and it process why did YOU bring up the sanctions? The UN is valid when it agrees with the US and our timeline, otherwise it is not our concern?
>>If we can make up our own rules why did you bring the 49 "supporting" nations?
>>
>
>I brought them up to bolster the argument, but pointed out that we didn't even need them. We are THE superpower and don't need the UN's authorization.