Maybe it is the information you post:

"Based on the evidence available at present, ISG
judged that it was unlikely that an offi cial transfer of
WMD material from Iraq to Syria took place. How-ever,
ISG was unable to rule out unoffi cial movement
of limited WMD-related materials."


I understand that you have made up you mind, there is no need to pretend it is based on evidence.


>
>I'm afraid there must be a disconnect here. I cannot understand you thinking that the wmd report saying the wmds were probably moved prior to our attack isn't probative. Oh well, I am giving up on this one. I can't show you what you refuse to see.