>>Maybe it is the information you post:
>>
>>"Based on the evidence available at present, ISG
>>judged that it was unlikely that an offi cial transfer of
>>WMD material from Iraq to Syria took place. How-ever,
>>ISG was unable to rule out unoffi cial movement
>>of limited WMD-related materials."
>>
>
>OFFICIAL TRANSFER v. unofficial movement. Get a clue dude.

Except, John, that the "unofficially moved" statement is absolutely useless. He could just as easily have written 'ISG is unable to rule out that Saddam ate them for breakfast".