Thanks for letting me know.

>It is widely known here in the U.S.:
>
>http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=1156
>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2005/07/20/new-la-times-editor-to-be_n_4450.html
>http://talkleft.com/new_archives/010880.html
>http://www.geocities.com/truthmasters/comments.html
>http://www.washtimes.com/op-ed/20050316-084147-3449r.htm
>http://www.thatliberalmedia.com/archives/004164.html
>http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1604
>http://www.napablogger.com/napablogger/2005/03/over_the_edge_w.html
>http://www.newuniversity.org/webEx.php?issue_date=11142005
>http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0616/p09s01-coop.html?s=t5
>http://americandigest.org/mt-archives/004116.php
>
>
>>>Given the bar set by your previous posts, the LaTimes is a well-known left-wing paper and so this post is debunked.
>>
>>I'm not familiar with the LA Times. Is this serious?