I have to use your own LATimes "and therefore are debunked" position on this one. Worldnetdaily, newsmax, and washtimes make foxnews looked like a ted kennedy publication.

>Some possibilities:
>
>http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20050427-121915-1667r.htm
>http://www.2la.org/syria/iraq-wmd.php
>http://www.2la.org/syria/wmd.html
>http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=36463
>http://www.nationalreview.com/geraghty/geraghty200401120834.asp
>http://www.state.gov/t/us/rm/24135.htm
>http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/3/2/230625.shtml
>http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20040816-011235-4438r.htm
>http://www.news24.com/News24/World/Iraq/0,,2-10-1460_1340941,00.html
>http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=36844
>
>
>>I am most certainly NOT ignoring any intelligense.
>>
>>If you read my post, I posted that the CIA's Iraq Survey Group, as well as
>>the United Nation's own team (their name escapes me) both scoured Iraq
>>for WMD's and neither found a trace.
>>
>>How is this 'totally ignoring any intelligence that supports this assertion'?
>>
>>And, what 'intelligence' can you provide that supports your own assertion
>>that Iraq moved these weapons?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>I disagree. You can't possibly beleive that Iraq had a stockpile of WMD's
>>>>that they have completly erased all evidence of?
>>>>
>>>>We've been in Iraq for 2 years now, and no one has found so much as 1 illegal
>>>>weapon. Not a trace.
>>>>
>>>>The lack of evidence speaks volumns.
>>>>
>>>
>>>It's not only possible for me to believe they removed them during the six months they had, it is what I believe. You are totally ignoring any intelligence that supports this assertion. I've posted several citations - read them.