>When I posted that comment, I was being completely facetious.
My bad re the "LAtimes debunked". Your
possibilities references also facetious? You dont list any from CBS, ABC, CNN, FOX, MSNBC, Univision, BBC World.
:0) Based on Evan's debunking other posts due to the source of the information in his opinion being a neo-con source. Here in the U.S., with freedom of speech, there is very little enforcement of nonpartison leanings in our media. Almost every source leans to the left or the right. (That is afterall, how many newspapers were started) It is necessary these days to watch and read more than one source and to read/hear both sides in order to see a more middle of the road view of the same events. I typically watch many news shows these days - CBS, ABC, CNN, FOX, MSNBC, Univision, BBC World, etc. Often I see the same story portrayed many different ways. I think it is important to use many sources and evaluate the story or source after weighing all of the sources. We cannot rule out any one source of information, but weigh its value based on other sources as well.
>
>
>>I have to use your own LATimes "and therefore are debunked" position on this one. Worldnetdaily, newsmax, and washtimes make foxnews looked like a ted kennedy publication.
>>
>>>Some
possibilities:
>>>
>>>
http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20050427-121915-1667r.htm>>>
http://www.2la.org/syria/iraq-wmd.php>>>
http://www.2la.org/syria/wmd.html>>>
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=36463>>>
http://www.nationalreview.com/geraghty/geraghty200401120834.asp>>>
http://www.state.gov/t/us/rm/24135.htm>>>
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/3/2/230625.shtml>>>
http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20040816-011235-4438r.htm>>>
http://www.news24.com/News24/World/Iraq/0,,2-10-1460_1340941,00.html>>>
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=36844>>>
>>>
>>>>I am most certainly NOT ignoring any intelligense.
>>>>
>>>>If you read my post, I posted that the CIA's Iraq Survey Group, as well as
>>>>the United Nation's own team (their name escapes me) both scoured Iraq
>>>>for WMD's and neither found a trace.
>>>>
>>>>How is this 'totally ignoring any intelligence that supports this assertion'?
>>>>
>>>>And, what 'intelligence' can you provide that supports your own assertion
>>>>that Iraq moved these weapons?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>I disagree. You can't possibly beleive that Iraq had a stockpile of WMD's
>>>>>>that they have completly erased all evidence of?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>We've been in Iraq for 2 years now, and no one has found so much as 1 illegal
>>>>>>weapon. Not a trace.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The lack of evidence speaks volumns.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>It's not only possible for me to believe they removed them during the six months they had, it is what I believe. You are totally ignoring any intelligence that supports this assertion. I've posted several citations - read them.
