>>>Bovine Scatology
>>
>>He goes on to list the details. I take it you don't believe him?
>
>No. I can spot the obvious bias.
Having read the article, I have created a new blog on my Dutch weblog. The issue: Do you believe organisations like Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International, who claim that human rights are violated there, or do you believe the writer of the article. I'm curious what the reactions will be.
I think you do not believe the writer. But how can you be sure that you are right? Why is the bias 'obvious' then?
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
