>>But here is the one thing I'll never understand about smoking. Many in their 50's and 60's (and up) say things to the effect that "when I started smoking, we didn't know about all the health dangers of smoking". I don't understand why it would take a report from Doc General to generally conclude that lighting something up, inhaling it, and then exhaling smoke would be dangerous to your health.
>
>FWIW, IIRC, the cigarette companies used to advertise about how good cigarettes were for you.
But did we believe them? I'm 52 and in the sixties we - the people - already knew very well that smoking is dangerous.
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
