>>On the other hand, do I understand correctly that WP was, indeed, used as an incendiary weapon against military targets? Whether the U.S. signed an agreement to this extent or not, it seems a cruel and inappropriate thing to do.
>
>No crueler than many other weapons, IMHO. War is an ugly business.

Don't we have a much kinder way of killing people? What about the bomb that kills people, but leaves the buildings intact? Sounds like a "capitalist" bomb doesn't it?<g>