>
>You say "The fact that you don't see things as I do indicates that maybe I am not doing as good a job of explaining as I could...". No. It's because your beliefs don't hold water.
>
>"...just don't want to see it..." Man I'd love it all to be true, it makes such a good yarn, and would prove to me that there is a, albeit mercurial, god.
>
>"or you are not able to understand the issue."
>
>now who's calling names!?
>
No one is calling names, I simply stated the possibilities.

>I'm not going to go on arguing this. But let me just ask you two questions:
>
>How old is the Earth?
>
>How long ago (and/or what was the date of) Noah's Flood?


The truth is neither of us know the answers to the above. Are you saying carbon dating is exactly 100% accurate? I don't take what science doles out as fact. There have been countless times when scientific "fact" has been disproven. Science is man's best guess at figuring out what God has done. We think a lot of what science has come up with is accurate, but much of it is still questionable. The scientific community isn't even 100% on these issues. Global warming is now threating to cause global cooling? I think I've determined what causes global warming - it is scientist who need research funding. Create a cause then demand the governments pay to research it.