>The claim of MS that VFP 9.0 is the most stable release they have so far is now in question to me. Why? SP1 has some 200 bugs fixed and they're coming up with SP2 aside from SEDNA which I guess will also have lots of fixes included. Worst, many of the reported bugs that were fixed are obvious and basic bugs which in the first place shouldn't be passing through first level of debugging. Reading the list of fixes of SP1, we have one bug that is so important to us that is not yet fixed: can't recognized legal size paper for some printer i.e. EPSON LX 300+, some HP Laserjets... We are then forced to set report behaviour to 80 which is awkward.
>
>Is VFP 9.0 the most stable version or the worst version released since 3.0? Whatever your interpretation in this question of us, we are still using it and in fact our system might be integrated with MS Navision come 2006.

Jess,

VFP9 is the most stable and best release, this is sure,
and, for me, avery version before to VFP8 it is unusable.

The 90% of the fixed bugs in VFP9 are bugs present in the preceding versions.
I think that they are present at least other 1000-2000 bugs, and I would be well happy
to see the list of the VFP9 SP2 bug fixed with 10000 elements.

Sure, I has others 100-200 bugs to send to the MS feedback in the 2006.

Fabio