>Hi Cetin,
>
>>Then adding another 0.01 EUR wouldn't hurt:)
>We'll make some serious money sometime ;-)
>
>>I agree building a string and doing a single pass would be better but I actually see danger in both approaches. Empty() function that is:)
>>-Field(s) might be supporting null
>>-Field type might be dangerous for this logic < g > ie: a logical. Is .f. empty or .t. then:)
>I realized some possible problem areas as well, but was lazy <bg>. I just took the original description to be "good enough" for the field domains worked on and commented on other problem areas.
>
>>If these problems were not an issue Max() might be used as a shortcut with most datatypes:
>
>the way I read the problem description, Max() would fail on
>!empty(target) and source>target
>
>but I am in fast skim mode reading up the postings from last week since I am again working abroad during the week in high security isolation area...
>
>regds
>
>thomas

You're right. I was thinking towards the process by itself is dangerous and didn't pay attention what I'm saying:)
Cetin