>Hi jess,
>
>>It's a thread meant to challenge the claim of MS about the 'MOST STABLE' thing. It's a constructive criticism I think.
>
>Well I think you have chosen a rather poor title for the thread, as I don't directly associate bugs with stability, and I think you do have the wrong idea of classifying bugs.
>
>If you started something like VFP9: the version with the most or least number of bugs, I would have agreed.

That's your opinion. If you have a car with a great engine but it has leaks under, would it be called a stable car? Two years ago, Nissan recalled SENTRA units sold when they found out that there is a glaring problem in that model. Cars have also bugs on there own, but majority are tolerable provided that I could still use them without harming me. Isn't it true that somehow VFP9.0 harmed you to the point of not using it until the known bugs are fixed? Stability also means solidity or firmness or constancy. That said, in my opinion, too much glaring bugs = instability.

>
>Walter,