>>Eylon,
>>
>>To say that we develop in VS is only accepted to those who are not aware enough in software development arena. But granting the argument is valid, still you have end-up of saying on the actual development you are using VFP, VB, VC etc.
>>
>>IMHO, sometimes I end up of saying that the reason why VFP is not being pushed equally with other tools is because VB is Bill Gates and VFP is Fox Software still. VB is legitimate child, VFP is adopted. And to push VFP equally with VB is saying that VFP is equal with VB which is also saying that Fox Software Team is equal with Bill Gates, a big blow to him. It's a matter of pride you know. :-)
>
>I know this is not a place for political parallels, but this VFP/Gates opposing paradigm bears unbelievable resemblance to our situation here... with VFP in the role of the democratic opposition, and guess who emulates Miloševiæ...

I don't disagree with you. Mine is just thoughts for fun, nothing serious about it. Still I am optimistic that VFP's future is promising.