Ok, let's then wait for Michel to confirm. But in this particular case I have not a slightest doubt and in fact these suspicions seem to me offending.

>Naomi,
>
>I don't know about you, but I have been fooled many time by ASSUMING that something happened/worked a certain way.
>There can only be enlightenment by UT management stating clearly how the nominations are tabulated and how the 3 "winners" are chosen.
>
>Some examples of bad assumptions:
>1) How the Iraqi people would affirm their proposed constitution;
>2) How the President of the United States is "elected";
>3) How "elections" work in Communist countries;
>4) In VFP8 (and many prior), that FLUSH would actually flush;
>5) In all versions of VFP, that SET REFRESH applies only to BROWSE windows.
>
>Full disclosure can only be good. The absence of full disclosure leaves room for conspiracy theories to happen.
>
>
>
>>The conspirancy exists in your imagination only.
>>
>>>Sure there could. Unless you are an employee of or spokesperson for the UT, I would like to hear it from them directly. They have been conspicuously silent so far in terms of direct answers to direct questions.
>>>
>>>
>>>>By simple count or you can call it reccount. There could be no other way.