>>>>>>So even if our mathematical model had a rigid rod with a specific length, we can get a relativistic measurement of the rod's length in the model by finding the observation encoded somewhere in the mind of an observer.
>>>>>
>>>>>...where observer is one of the observer objects in the model.
>>>>
>>>>Observer object. So, you're thinking that instead of using ordinary particles to create a neuro-network that makes relative measurements, you'd use a "special" kind of particle for a conscious observer?
>>>
>>>Sorry, skipped school when neural networks were scheduled. Wouldn't know.
>>
>>
>>What did you mean by "observer object"?
>
>Along the lines of what you started here - it would have at least coordinates, and then it would have many other properties (the definition of the local referent frame among them), methods to observe the event, record it, measure, calculate etc. And it would do that from its local POV. Then the overall app would gather these from observer objects and aggregate them after translating into absolute space.


If an observer is a class, and matter is a class, then the observer isn't actually made of matter.

So that probably can't be right.