Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
.Net 2.0 Slower than Foxpro
Message
From
26/12/2005 23:23:07
 
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Visual FoxPro and .NET
Environment versions
Visual FoxPro:
VFP 9
OS:
Windows XP
Network:
Windows 2003 Server
Database:
MS SQL Server
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01080435
Message ID:
01080912
Views:
30
Rod,

I think this would be a very valuable excercise. Please keep in mind the mindset of those posting against your idea before placing any weight on their comments.

Folks such as Jim N., who I can guarantee has never gone so far as boot up the VS.net IDE. Then you have someone like Terry T. making a comment that the .net market needs to be proped up.

Funny, I just went to Dice.com. Looked up VFP, a handful of openings (8) are displayed. Of which maybe 5 are legitimate VFP openings. One had todays date. Entered C# and received almost 300 hits, of which almost a dozen were from today.




>Hi Terry and Walter and whoever wants to join the discussion.
>
> I am going to be opening a thread and/or a blog entry( prob monday but maybe tomorrow) to discuss these data issues.
>
> I have some questions about the perceptions of VFP developers and .NET. From my point of view there are a number of misconceptions and I think WE ALL would benefit from a real technical discussion.
>
>For instance your statment that his statement that VFP is faster than .NET....
>
>I don't agree with this assertion on numerous grounds. The primary reason I dont agree with it is that it is very context based. There are so many variables that could be causing a problem and I would like to explore what they might be.
>
>Lets focus on facts not gut feelings or assumptions.... We can all challenge each others facts or assertions.
>
>If you are all game does this sound like a constructive exercise?
>
>
>
>Rodman

(On an infant's shirt): Already smarter than Bush
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform