>
>Could be. However, the second amendment gives a little more umph to the argument for bearing arms, doesn't it?
It does as far as a legal arguement but the same arguement should be made for a citizen owning heavy weapons that you would not support.
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only