>>But that gets away from the point that there is no such thing as a free lunch, especially in economics. Until someone can explain how consistently spending more money (outlays) than you bring in (revenues) is a good idea, I'll continue to think those policies are foolish.
>
>No arguments on spending. I can't figure out how to get either party to stop the spending though. Let me know if you figure it out, cause that's the candidate I'm going with.

Reagan could have vetoed that spending, but he didn't.